0.09/0.10 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.09/0.10 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 1920 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 240 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Wed Jul 30 09:37:04 EDT 2025 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime : 0.15/0.41 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.15/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Omf30EvrVn/E---3.1_370.p 6.50/1.62 # Version: 3.0.0-ho 6.50/1.62 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSA. 6.50/1.62 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 6.50/1.62 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 1200s (5) cores 6.50/1.62 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 240s (1) cores 6.50/1.62 # Starting new_ho_3 with 240s (1) cores 6.50/1.62 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 240s (1) cores 6.50/1.62 # new_ho_3 with pid 455 completed with status 0 6.50/1.62 # Result found by new_ho_3 6.50/1.62 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSA. 6.50/1.62 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 6.50/1.62 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 1200s (5) cores 6.50/1.62 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 240s (1) cores 6.50/1.62 # Starting new_ho_3 with 240s (1) cores 6.50/1.62 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true) 6.50/1.62 # Search class: HGUSF-FFMF21-SSSFFMBN 6.50/1.62 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total) 6.50/1.62 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 124s (1) cores 6.50/1.62 # ehoh_best2_full_lfho with pid 461 completed with status 0 6.50/1.62 # Result found by ehoh_best2_full_lfho 6.50/1.62 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSA. 6.50/1.62 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 6.50/1.62 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 1200s (5) cores 6.50/1.62 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 240s (1) cores 6.50/1.62 # Starting new_ho_3 with 240s (1) cores 6.50/1.62 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true) 6.50/1.62 # Search class: HGUSF-FFMF21-SSSFFMBN 6.50/1.62 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total) 6.50/1.62 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 124s (1) cores 6.50/1.62 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 6.50/1.62 6.50/1.62 # Proof found! 6.50/1.62 # SZS status Theorem 6.50/1.62 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 6.50/1.62 thf(decl_sort1, type, a: $tType). 6.50/1.62 thf(decl_23, type, c0: a). 6.50/1.62 thf(decl_24, type, x: a). 6.50/1.62 thf(decl_25, type, cP: a > a > a). 6.50/1.62 thf(decl_26, type, esk1_1: (a > a > a > $o) > a). 6.50/1.62 thf(decl_27, type, esk2_1: (a > a > a > $o) > a). 6.50/1.62 thf(decl_28, type, esk3_1: (a > a > a > $o) > a). 6.50/1.62 thf(decl_29, type, esk4_1: (a > a > a > $o) > a). 6.50/1.62 thf(decl_30, type, esk5_1: (a > a > a > $o) > a). 6.50/1.62 thf(decl_31, type, esk6_1: (a > a > a > $o) > a). 6.50/1.62 thf(decl_32, type, esk7_1: (a > a > a > $o) > a). 6.50/1.62 thf(decl_33, type, esk8_1: (a > a > a > $o) > a). 6.50/1.62 thf(decl_34, type, esk9_1: (a > a > a > $o) > a). 6.50/1.62 thf(cS_INCL_LEM6_pme, conjecture, ((![X1:a, X2:a]:(((cP @ X1 @ X2)!=(c0)))&![X1:a, X2:a, X3:a, X4:a]:(((((X1)=(X2))&((X3)=(X4)))<=((cP @ X1 @ X3)=(cP @ X2 @ X4)))))=>(((x)=(c0))<=![X5:a > a > a > $o]:(((X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0)<=(![X6:a, X7:a, X8:a]:(((X5 @ X6 @ X7 @ X8)<=(?[X9:a, X10:a, X11:a, X12:a, X13:a, X14:a]:(((((((X6)=(cP @ X9 @ X10))&((X7)=(cP @ X11 @ X12)))&(X5 @ X9 @ X11 @ X13))&(X5 @ X10 @ X12 @ X14))&((X8)=(cP @ X13 @ X14))))|(((X6)=(X8))&((X7)=(c0)))|(((X7)=(X8))&((X6)=(c0))))))&($true)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Omf30EvrVn/E---3.1_370.p', cS_INCL_LEM6_pme)). 6.50/1.62 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(((![X1:a, X2:a]:(((cP @ X1 @ X2)!=(c0)))&![X1:a, X2:a, X3:a, X4:a]:((((cP @ X1 @ X3)=(cP @ X2 @ X4))=>(((X1)=(X2))&((X3)=(X4))))))=>(![X5:a > a > a > $o]:(((![X6:a, X7:a, X8:a]:(((?[X9:a, X10:a, X11:a, X12:a, X13:a, X14:a]:(((((((X6)=(cP @ X9 @ X10))&((X7)=(cP @ X11 @ X12)))&(X5 @ X9 @ X11 @ X13))&(X5 @ X10 @ X12 @ X14))&((X8)=(cP @ X13 @ X14))))|(((X6)=(X8))&((X7)=(c0)))|(((X7)=(X8))&((X6)=(c0))))=>(X5 @ X6 @ X7 @ X8)))&$true)=>(X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0)))=>((x)=(c0))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cS_INCL_LEM6_pme])])). 6.50/1.62 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X31:a, X32:a, X33:a, X34:a, X35:a, X36:a, X37:a > a > a > $o]:(((((cP @ X31 @ X32)!=(c0))&((((X33)=(X34))|((cP @ X33 @ X35)!=(cP @ X34 @ X36)))&(((X35)=(X36))|((cP @ X33 @ X35)!=(cP @ X34 @ X36)))))&(((((((((((esk2_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37))|(((esk1_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37))|((esk1_1 @ X37)=(cP @ (esk4_1 @ X37) @ (esk5_1 @ X37))))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0))&(((esk1_1 @ X37)=(c0))|(((esk1_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37))|((esk1_1 @ X37)=(cP @ (esk4_1 @ X37) @ (esk5_1 @ X37))))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0)))&((((esk2_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37))|(((esk2_1 @ X37)=(c0))|((esk1_1 @ X37)=(cP @ (esk4_1 @ X37) @ (esk5_1 @ X37))))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0))&(((esk1_1 @ X37)=(c0))|(((esk2_1 @ X37)=(c0))|((esk1_1 @ X37)=(cP @ (esk4_1 @ X37) @ (esk5_1 @ X37))))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0))))&(((((esk2_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37))|(((esk1_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37))|((esk2_1 @ X37)=(cP @ (esk6_1 @ X37) @ (esk7_1 @ X37))))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0))&(((esk1_1 @ X37)=(c0))|(((esk1_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37))|((esk2_1 @ X37)=(cP @ (esk6_1 @ X37) @ (esk7_1 @ X37))))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0)))&((((esk2_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37))|(((esk2_1 @ X37)=(c0))|((esk2_1 @ X37)=(cP @ (esk6_1 @ X37) @ (esk7_1 @ X37))))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0))&(((esk1_1 @ X37)=(c0))|(((esk2_1 @ X37)=(c0))|((esk2_1 @ X37)=(cP @ (esk6_1 @ X37) @ (esk7_1 @ X37))))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0)))))&(((((esk2_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37))|(((esk1_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37))|(X37 @ (esk4_1 @ X37) @ (esk6_1 @ X37) @ (esk8_1 @ X37)))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0))&(((esk1_1 @ X37)=(c0))|(((esk1_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37))|(X37 @ (esk4_1 @ X37) @ (esk6_1 @ X37) @ (esk8_1 @ X37)))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0)))&((((esk2_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37))|(((esk2_1 @ X37)=(c0))|(X37 @ (esk4_1 @ X37) @ (esk6_1 @ X37) @ (esk8_1 @ X37)))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0))&(((esk1_1 @ X37)=(c0))|(((esk2_1 @ X37)=(c0))|(X37 @ (esk4_1 @ X37) @ (esk6_1 @ X37) @ (esk8_1 @ X37)))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0)))))&(((((esk2_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37))|(((esk1_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37))|(X37 @ (esk5_1 @ X37) @ (esk7_1 @ X37) @ (esk9_1 @ X37)))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0))&(((esk1_1 @ X37)=(c0))|(((esk1_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37))|(X37 @ (esk5_1 @ X37) @ (esk7_1 @ X37) @ (esk9_1 @ X37)))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0)))&((((esk2_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37))|(((esk2_1 @ X37)=(c0))|(X37 @ (esk5_1 @ X37) @ (esk7_1 @ X37) @ (esk9_1 @ X37)))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0))&(((esk1_1 @ X37)=(c0))|(((esk2_1 @ X37)=(c0))|(X37 @ (esk5_1 @ X37) @ (esk7_1 @ X37) @ (esk9_1 @ X37)))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0)))))&(((((esk2_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37))|(((esk1_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37))|((esk3_1 @ X37)=(cP @ (esk8_1 @ X37) @ (esk9_1 @ X37))))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0))&(((esk1_1 @ X37)=(c0))|(((esk1_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37))|((esk3_1 @ X37)=(cP @ (esk8_1 @ X37) @ (esk9_1 @ X37))))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0)))&((((esk2_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37))|(((esk2_1 @ X37)=(c0))|((esk3_1 @ X37)=(cP @ (esk8_1 @ X37) @ (esk9_1 @ X37))))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0))&(((esk1_1 @ X37)=(c0))|(((esk2_1 @ X37)=(c0))|((esk3_1 @ X37)=(cP @ (esk8_1 @ X37) @ (esk9_1 @ X37))))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0)))))&(~(X37 @ (esk1_1 @ X37) @ (esk2_1 @ X37) @ (esk3_1 @ X37))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0)))&((x)!=(c0))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])])). 6.50/1.62 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X5:a > a > a > $o]:(((X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0)|~((X5 @ (esk1_1 @ X5) @ (esk2_1 @ X5) @ (esk3_1 @ X5)))|~(($true)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 6.50/1.62 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X5:a > a > a > $o]:(((X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0)|~((X5 @ (esk1_1 @ X5) @ (esk2_1 @ X5) @ (esk3_1 @ X5))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 6.50/1.62 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X5:a > a > a > $o]:((((esk1_1 @ X5)=(c0))|((esk1_1 @ X5)=(esk3_1 @ X5))|((esk3_1 @ X5)=(cP @ (esk8_1 @ X5) @ (esk9_1 @ X5)))|(X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0)|~(($true)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 6.50/1.62 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X51:a > a > a > $o, X50:a > a > a > $o]:(((X51 @ x @ c0 @ c0)|(X50 @ x @ c0 @ c0)|~(((X51 @ (esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:(((X51 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)|(X50 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))))) @ (esk2_1 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:(((X51 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)|(X50 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))))) @ (esk3_1 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:(((X51 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)|(X50 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))))))|(X50 @ (esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:(((X51 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)|(X50 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))))) @ (esk2_1 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:(((X51 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)|(X50 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))))) @ (esk3_1 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:(((X51 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)|(X50 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)))))))))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])). 6.50/1.62 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a, X2:a]:(((cP @ X1 @ X2)!=(c0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 6.50/1.62 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X5:a > a > a > $o]:((((esk1_1 @ X5)=(c0))|((esk3_1 @ X5)=(esk1_1 @ X5))|((esk3_1 @ X5)=(cP @ (esk8_1 @ X5) @ (esk9_1 @ X5)))|(X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 6.50/1.62 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X21:a > a > a > $o, X5:a > a > a > $o]:(((X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0)|(X21 @ x @ c0 @ c0)|~((X5 @ (esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:(((X21 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)|(X5 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))))) @ (esk2_1 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:(((X21 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)|(X5 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))))) @ (esk3_1 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:(((X21 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)|(X5 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))))))))), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 6.50/1.62 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X5:a > a > a > $o]:((((esk3_1 @ X5)=(esk1_1 @ X5))|((esk1_1 @ X5)=(c0))|(X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0)|((esk3_1 @ X5)!=(c0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8])). 6.50/1.62 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X5:a > a > a > $o]:((((esk3_1 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:(((X5 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)|((Z2)!=(c0))))))=(c0))|(X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_9])). 6.50/1.62 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X5:a > a > a > $o]:((((esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:(((X5 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)|((Z2)!=(c0))))))=(c0))|(X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])])])). 6.50/1.62 thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X5:a > a > a > $o]:(((X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0)|~(((X5 @ c0 @ (esk2_1 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:(((X5 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)|((Z2)!=(c0)))))) @ (esk3_1 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:(((X5 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)|((Z2)!=(c0)))))))|((esk3_1 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:(((X5 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)|((Z2)!=(c0))))))!=(c0)))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4, c_0_12])])])). 6.50/1.62 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X5:a > a > a > $o]:((((esk3_1 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:(((X5 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)|((Z2)!=(c0))))))=(c0))|(X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])])). 6.50/1.62 thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X21:a > a > a > $o, X5:a > a > a > $o]:(((X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0)|(X21 @ x @ c0 @ c0)|~((X21 @ (esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:(((X21 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)|(X5 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))))) @ (esk2_1 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:(((X21 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)|(X5 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))))) @ (esk3_1 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:(((X21 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)|(X5 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))))))))), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 6.50/1.62 thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ![X5:a > a > a > $o]:((((esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:(((X5 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)|((Z2)!=(c0))))))=(c0))|(X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_14])])])). 6.50/1.62 thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ![X5:a > a > a > $o]:((((esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:((((Z0)!=(x))|(X5 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)))))=(x))|(X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_15])). 6.50/1.62 thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ((x)!=(c0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 6.50/1.62 thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17])])]), c_0_18]), ['proof']). 6.50/1.62 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 6.50/1.62 # Parsed axioms : 5 6.50/1.62 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 4 6.50/1.62 # Initial clauses : 25 6.50/1.62 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0 6.50/1.62 # Initial clauses in saturation : 25 6.50/1.62 # Processed clauses : 2284 6.50/1.62 # ...of these trivial : 3 6.50/1.62 # ...subsumed : 1004 6.50/1.62 # ...remaining for further processing : 1277 6.50/1.62 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 6.50/1.62 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 6.50/1.62 # Backward-subsumed : 107 6.50/1.62 # Backward-rewritten : 0 6.50/1.62 # Generated clauses : 12454 6.50/1.62 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 11329 6.50/1.62 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 6.50/1.62 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 6.50/1.62 # Paramodulations : 4924 6.50/1.62 # Factorizations : 3 6.50/1.62 # NegExts : 530 6.50/1.62 # Equation resolutions : 101 6.50/1.62 # Disequality decompositions : 0 6.50/1.62 # Total rewrite steps : 1230 6.50/1.62 # ...of those cached : 1225 6.50/1.62 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 6.50/1.62 # Propositional check models : 0 6.50/1.62 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 6.50/1.62 # Propositional clauses : 0 6.50/1.62 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 6.50/1.62 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 6.50/1.62 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 6.50/1.62 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 6.50/1.62 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 6.50/1.62 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 6.50/1.62 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 6.50/1.62 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 6.50/1.62 # Current number of processed clauses : 989 6.50/1.62 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8 6.50/1.62 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 6.50/1.62 # Negative unit clauses : 2 6.50/1.62 # Non-unit-clauses : 979 6.50/1.62 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8692 6.50/1.62 # ...number of literals in the above : 63447 6.50/1.62 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 6.50/1.62 # Current number of archived clauses : 288 6.50/1.62 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 131450 6.50/1.62 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10076 6.50/1.62 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1046 6.50/1.62 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 157 6.50/1.62 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 6.50/1.62 # BW rewrite match attempts : 5 6.50/1.62 # BW rewrite match successes : 3 6.50/1.62 # Condensation attempts : 0 6.50/1.62 # Condensation successes : 0 6.50/1.62 # Termbank termtop insertions : 970542 6.50/1.62 # Search garbage collected termcells : 587 6.50/1.62 6.50/1.62 # ------------------------------------------------- 6.50/1.62 # User time : 1.180 s 6.50/1.62 # System time : 0.009 s 6.50/1.62 # Total time : 1.188 s 6.50/1.62 # Maximum resident set size: 1956 pages 6.50/1.62 6.50/1.62 # ------------------------------------------------- 6.50/1.62 # User time : 1.182 s 6.50/1.62 # System time : 0.009 s 6.50/1.62 # Total time : 1.191 s 6.50/1.62 # Maximum resident set size: 1732 pages 6.50/1.62 % E exiting 6.50/1.62 % E exiting 6.50/1.62 EOF